Casa Lapostolle 2|
3 | 4
| 5 | Video
Up
next were two Chardonnays. The Casa Lapostolle, Casablanca Valley,
Chardonnay 2005 was a golden yellow with intriguing aromas of exotic
fruits, white truffle, gravel and petrol. The wine was medium-bodied,
crisp and lean with nice balance, and no obtrusive oak flavors characteristic
of the “New World” style (indeed, less than 10% of the
wine underwent aging in new oak barrels). I was most captivated by
the oily nose, slightly reminiscent of good German Rieslings. This
wine would most appeal to white wine drinkers that generally prefer
Sauvignon Blanc to Chardonnay. Grade: B+.
In stark contrast was the Casa Lapostolle, Casablanca Valley, Cuvée
Alexandre Chardonnay 2004, a perennial favorite in the wine press
that typically garners numerous 90+ point reviews. More than half
of the wine underwent fermentation in new French oak, resulting
in the classic aromas of “New World” Chardonnay, namely
vanilla and oak. Less than 2% of the wine, however, underwent malolactic
fermentation resulting in a white that was elegant, crisp and nicely
balanced, with floral notes, rich tastes of white fruits and sweet
spices. Although I preferred the regular Chardonnay to the Cuvée
Alexandre, the wine was elegant, well-made and sure to appeal to
Chardonnay fans. Grade: B.
Next
on the tasting list was the Casa Lapostolle, Rapel Valley, Merlot
2004. Strangely, the sample bottle was missing. Due to our late
arrival time, it was already past six when we were conducting our
tasting and the office was closed. I’m assuming someone grabbed
the open bottle on their way out to have with dinner. I’m
certain that it had nothing to do with the name of our website.
Accordingly, the first of the red wines was the Casa Lapostolle,
Rapel Valley, Cabernet Sauvignon 2004. This wine has been a staple
in our household for years; it is consistently good and reliable.
2003 was an exceptional vintage, but we tasted the 2004 vintage
which was just released. A blend of 85% Cabernet Sauvignon and 15%
Carmenère, the wine was floral, with a light ruby color,
smooth and elegant with nice balance between its sweet, red cherry
fruit and soft tannins. Much more refined than the brawny 2003 vintage,
the wine was simple and nice. This would make an excellent dinner
companion. Grade: B/B+.
Ironically
(at least for us at NoMerlot.com), the wine that put Casa Lapostolle
on the map was their Cuvée Alexandre Merlot. One of the drawbacks
of the name of our website is the perception that we hate all Merlots,
when in fact, we only want to bash bad Merlot. I’ve always
liked Chilean Merlots and I was quite impressed with the Casa Lapostolle,
Colchagua Valley, Cuvée Alexandre Merlot 2004. A blend of
85% Merlot and 15% Carmenère, the wine was sourced from non-irrigated
60 year old vines from the Apalta Vineyard. The wine was a deep
purple/ruby hue with aromas of plums and cherries. Rich, smooth
and elegant, with intense flavors of fresh red fruits intermingled
with mocha, this Merlot was nicely structured with firm tannins
and a beautiful finish. Grade: A-.
On the other hand, I was slightly disappointed with the Casa Lapostolle,
Colchagua Valley, Cuvée Alexandre Cabernet Sauvignon 2004,
the last wine of our tasting. I’ve had previous vintages of
this wine and always thought it was pretty good. The 2004 vintage,
however, was a difficult one in Chile. A blend of 85% Cabernet Sauvignon
and 15% Merlot that is also sourced from non-irrigated 60 year old
vines from the Apalta Vineyard, the wine showed a dark reddish
Casa Lapostolle 2|
3 | 4
| 5 | Video
|